CategoryAnimal Science - Swine Nutrition
Date Full Report Received03/14/2011
Date Abstract Report Received03/14/2011
Using purebred Yorkshire pigs, a selection line for decreased RFI and a control line, which was randomly selected for four generations and then selected for increased RFI, were started in 2001. In early generations, only pigs from the select line were evaluated for feed intake. During these generations only select sows farrowed two litters to provide additional information for estimation of breeding values. However, starting in the fourth generation, both select and control line pigs were evaluated for feed intake and both select and control line sows were kept for a second litter. Weight and ultrasonic backfat on the sow were recorded when entering the farrowing house and at weaning. Weight and ultrasonic backfat were used to estimate fat and protein mass at the beginning and end of lactation in order to evaluate loss of fat and protein during lactation. Feed intake was recorded on the sows during lactation. All piglets born to a sow were recorded and coded for live, stillborn, or mummy. Individual birth weights of all live and stillborn piglets were recorded. At weaning, individual weights of all piglets were recorded. Farrowing and weaning dates were also recorded for all pigs. After 6 generations, the select line had two more piglets farrowed per litter yet only one more piglet born alive. This was due to the select line having one more stillborn per litter. There was no difference in number of mummies between the two lines, although the trend was for the select line to have 0.1 more mummies per litter. There was no difference between the lines in the number of piglets weaned by sow, thus the select line lost one more piglet from birth to weaning. The select line had greater litter weights at birth, even after adjusting for number born. The select piglets kept this weight advantage through to weaning and also grew faster during the lactation period. However, this increased performance in terms of piglets was at a cost to the sow. Although there was no difference in body weight or composition (as estimated using ultrasonic backfat) at the start of lactation, sows from the select line lost more weight during lactation, which was primarily due to a greater fat mass depletion. Feed intake did not differ between lines until the sixth generation. In generation 6, the select line consumed less feed than the control line. Generation 6 was also the first generation that resulted from selecting the control line for increased RFI. In conclusion, selection for RFI has positively affected piglet numbers and pre-weaning growth but has negatively affected sow body condition change during lactation. Jack Dekkers email@example.com.