special report

 
Bulletin Board
Special Report

 

Pork Checkoff Celebrates 20 Years
of Progress


While the world’s attention in 1985 focused on arms control summits between U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, U.S. pork producers were making history of their own with the creation of a new Pork Checkoff.

 “We were so fortunate to have bold leaders with wisdom and a vision for the future,” said Danita Rodibaugh, an Indiana pork producer and president of the National Pork Board.  “Sometimes I wonder if they knew the future they were about to write.”

When President Reagan signed the landmark Pork Promotion, Research and Consumer Information Act into law in December 1985, a simple signature forever changed the direction of the pork industry in America. By the end of 1986, the resulting national Pork Checkoff was in place, and the National Pork Board had been formed. 

The Checkoff that pork producers created 20 years ago worked then, and it works now, said Orville Sweet, former chief executive officer on the National Pork Producers Council.

“The most powerful force in the world is the leverage resulting from organization,” Sweet said.  “We’re the Cadillac of the meat industry right now, not because we’re selling the most, but because we’re selling the best.”

Producers Bet Checkoff’s Future on Other White Meat®

“We’re the Cadillac of the meat industry right now, not because we’re selling the most, but because we’re selling the best.”

This transformation didn’t happen by accident.  In the mid-1980s, producers knew pork needed an extreme makeover to beat the legacy left over from the World War II era, when fat was valued as a premium with pork. “Lean” had become the buzzword of the day, and chicken was quickly becoming the meat of choice for millions of consumers. “Twenty years ago, pork was viewed as a cheap protein source and an unsophisticated product,” recalled Heidi Vittetoe, a pork producer from Washington, Iowa.

Change wasn’t easy, though.  At a time when the pork industry’s slogan was “Pork-what a good idea,” the 1986 debut of the Pork Checkoff’s Pork. The Other White Meat® seemed downright blasphemous to many producers.  How could pork sink so low as to compare itself to chicken, the dominant protein of the health-conscious 1980s?

“There were a few fists pounded and some voices raised,” recalled Mark Williams, a former account supervisor with Bozell, the advertising agency that presented the revolutionary concept during a meeting at Iowa’s Hotel Ft. Des Moines.   “The proposal was startling and contradictory to what people were expecting, but we believed it could make marketing history.”

Looking back, it’s easy to forget that much more than an advertising campaign was riding on this proposal. In 1986, pork producers had agreed to create the new Pork Checkoff on a trial basis.  Within 18 months, they would vote about whether they wanted to continue funding the program.

“A tremendous amount of credit needs to be given to the people who decided to go with Pork. The Other White Meat,” Williams said. “They bet the Pork Checkoff on it.”

Long before Bozell made that memorable presentation at the Hotel Ft. Des Moines, its creative team pulled out all the stops to develop Pork. The Other White Meat. 

Recognizing that the new Pork Checkoff involved a sizable marketing investment, the agency knew pork needed a big idea to reposition itself and make that investment pay off.

 “At the time, chicken had everything going for it and pork had almost nothing going for it, except for maybe its flavor,” Williams said.  “Consumers believed pork was fatty, high in calories, unhealthy and bad for you in every way.”

top

Pork Lean as Chicken?

Then came a shocking revelation. When the agency began researching the facts about chicken and fresh pork, they found that the two meats’ nutritional profiles were much more similar than anyone had believed.  Thanks to the era’s leaner hogs, pork had become a versatile, healthy source of protein, but it still suffered from a severe consumer perception problem.

What if pork became The Other White Meat?  Long before Bozell presented the concept to pork producers, the team tested the slogan with target market consumers, comparing the results against four other potential campaigns.

“None of the other campaigns came close to moving the needle like The Other White Meat,” Williams noted.  “Without this testing, The Other White Meat wouldn’t exist.”

top

Consumers Change their Attitudes about Pork

When pork producers decided to take a chance on The Other White Meat, the slogan enjoyed phenomenal success right from the start. After 10 weeks of ads in target cities, the number of people who thought of pork as white meat jumped from 12 percent to 72 percent.  Within a few years, The Other White Meat had become the fifth most recognized advertising slogan in America.

“The Pork Checkoff’s Other White Meat advertising campaign did more to change the perception of pork and demand for pork than any other one thing,” said Ray Hankes, a pork producer who now works for Tyson.

Provocative print and television advertisements with messages such as, “We lead you to temptation but deliver you from evil,” helped pork compete head-to-head with chicken.

“We wanted to stop people in their tracks and ask how pork could be a white meat,” Williams said. 

To show that pork was as easy to prepare as chicken and more versatile, Bozell took 40 poultry recipes like chicken cordon bleu and transformed them into pork-based entrees that were featured in the advertising campaign.

 “The Pork Checkoff’s Other White Meat campaign did more to change the perception of pork and demand for pork than any other one thing.”

top

Peggy Fleming Speaks Up for Pork 

The Pork Checkoff also recruited figure-skating icon Peggy Fleming, a farm girl who won the gold medal at the 1968 Olympic Winter Games and captured three straight World Championship titles, to be an ambassador for the pork industry.

“Peggy was America’s sweetheart and brought a sense of excitement to the Pork Checkoff,” Williams recalled.  “She helped the pork industry attract media attention before The Other White Meat campaign even started running.”

Fleming, an advocate of health and wellness, made appearances at the American Pork Congress, the predecessor of the World Pork Expo.  She also participated in a live video news conference broadcast from a Los Angeles grocery store.  In short order, headlines like “Peggy Fleming Pitches Pork” began appearing in major publications across the country.  

The results of Pork. The Other White Meat were astounding, considering that this was the pork industry’s first significant advertising campaign ever.

“We learned early on that we’d strapped ourselves to a rocket,” Williams said. 

In a very short time, pork producers had set out to  change people’s minds about pork with the innovative campaign.  And when producers voted whether to continue the Checkoff in the fall of 1988, the referendum passed by more than 80 percent, recalled Jim Meimann, executive vice president of governance and operations for Pork Checkoff.

top

Building a Solid Future

As the Pork.  The Other White Meat campaign continued to win new customers, producers continued their march toward achieving quality standards in the pork industry.  This has been aided through various educational tools and programs created by the Checkoff during the last 20 years.

One of the most notable programs, Pork Quality Assurance™ (PQA), was created in 1989 to emphasize best practices in the handling and use of animal health products.  The Youth PQA program, launched in 2004, helps young people learn how to produce safe, nutritious pork.

Managing industry-threatening diseases is progressing on farms across America thanks to Checkoff-funded tools and strategies. 

Consider the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Initiative. The collaborative effort between producers, academia, industry and government has defined the research and educational needs of pork producers and veterinarians to accelerate the successful management of PRRS.

In addition, increased public awareness of animal welfare has required pork producers to continually reevaluate their management practices.  The Pork Checkoff-funded Swine Welfare Assurance ProgramSM (SWAP) was launched in 2003 to help producers objectively assess and benchmark the care and welfare of their pigs and implement best practices in their operations.

Checkoff-funded educational programs to help pork producers be good stewards of the environment also remain a priority.  These programs, including the Environmental Steward awards, focus on nutrient management, air and water quality, federal and sTaste regulations, and neighbor relations.

As it has for 20 years, the Pork Checkoff will continue to help producers meet the challenges of the future.

“The can-do attitude of the people in this industry and the way they work together to solve problems and issues is one of the great things about pork producers,” Rodibaugh said.  “The 20th anniversary of the Pork Checkoff shows how good things happen when people get together to share ideas, share funds and share dreams.”

top


NPPC and the National Pork Board Separate

Hog prices collapsed in the fall of 1998, taking thousands of producers down with them.  One producer leader called it the industry's version of the Great Depression's Black Friday.  Another wrote to President Bill Clinton to inform him that “the economic crisis facing America's pork producers must be viewed as a national emergency.”

The catastrophic price collapse also triggered profound changes in the structure of the pork industry's promotion and public policy organizations.  At the beginning of 1998, the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC), the industry's public-policy organization, had about 100 employees and was administering, under contract, about $50 million of Checkoff money annually for the promotion, research and consumer information programs of the National Pork Board.  The Pork Board had two employees to oversee collections and monitor contracts.

Shortly after the price collapse that drove prices below Depression-era levels, the Campaign for Family Farms, a group of Midwestern producers, collected about 20,000 signatures on a petition asking the secretary of agriculture to call a referendum on the continuation of the Pork Checkoff.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture certified about 10,500 of those signatures - more than 5,000 fewer than required under department rules - but U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman authorized the referendum for the fall of 2000.

On Jan. 11, 2001, just days before the Clinton administration would end, Glickman announced the results - 15,591 votes against continuing the Checkoff program and 14,396 for - and ordered the termination of the Checkoff.  NPPC officials immediately sought and were granted an injunction to stop Glickman's order pending a further court challenge of the Checkoff's legality.

In the meantime, new U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman, responding to complaints about the referendum process, announced a restructuring agreement that she said would “ensure the separation of the National Pork Board and NPPC and make the program more responsive to concerns of pork producers.” 

The restructuring required the National Pork Board by July 1, 2001, to:

  • employ its own management and staff, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer;

  • manage separate contracts for promotion, research and consumer information projects;

  • maintain separate office operations from the NPPC; and

  • maintain separate communications from NPPC.

She also ordered that “no earlier than June 2003,” the USDA would conduct  a survey of eligible pork producers  and importers to determine if 15 percent of those eligible favor a referendum.  (Rules for that survey, delayed by a challenge to the Checkoff's constitutionality that reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, are now being written by USDA.)

NPPC announced at the same time that it would focus only on policy-related legislative and regulatory issues funded from voluntary contributions.

The agreement, which ultimately was validated by a federal judge who concluded that the 2000 referendum had not been conducted lawfully, took place on schedule in  2001 and remains in place today.  Details of the Separation Agreement and a more complete history of the organizations are available on pork.org, the National Pork Board's Web site.  Both can be found under the News and Information tab.  The history can be found in the online version of the Quick Facts Handbook.

top